Product / Marketing performance

Put marketing in context.

See what the advertising platforms delivered. Understand what the downstream data can support. Build the connection on definitions your team can explain.

An illustration of the experience

Explore the views and regions. All data is fictional; no customer systems are connected.

ChartSplice
Illustrative data
YOUR OPERATING PICTURE

Marketing overview

September 2026 · Advertising delivery

Sep 01–30
All advertising accounts

Marketing report. Advertising spend $208,800.

Advertising spend$209KGoogle Ads + Meta Ads
Reported clicks73,970Delivery activity
Impressions6.10MNot unique people

Delivery by channel

USD / SEP 2026
Google Ads42,120 clicks
$126,400
Meta Ads31,850 clicks
$82,400
Acquisition attribution needs a matched cohort.

Ad delivery is available here. Customer acquisition cost and return on ad spend require validated downstream definitions and joins.

Know what the number means. Clicks and impressions are platform delivery measures, not appointments or new patients.

DEFINED
View the data & definitions
Fictional September 2026 advertising delivery
ChannelSpendClicksImpressions
Google Ads$126,40042,1203,240,000
Meta Ads$82,40031,8502,860,000

All figures are fictional. Distinct payers count each person once within the selected scope; adding location counts would double-count people seen in more than one location. This example demonstrates reporting concepts, not a connected customer environment.

Sample period: Sep 2026Fictional figures · No customer data

Start with what the source actually measures

Advertising spend, impressions, and clicks describe delivery activity. CRM contacts describe records in a different system. Appointments, purchases, and collections describe other business events.

All of them may belong in a marketing review. Putting them next to each other does not automatically make them a matched acquisition funnel.

ChartSplice separates source delivery from downstream measurement until the data and definitions support connecting them. That gives the team useful visibility now and a clear account of what must be resolved for the next level of reporting.

Read delivery at the right level

Channel and campaign reporting can help explain where advertising activity occurred and how it changed over time. The reporting path needs to preserve the source grain, currency, date basis, and account scope.

Reporting layer What it can answer What it does not prove by itself
Advertising delivery Where spend, impressions, and clicks occurred Which people became patients
CRM activity Which records and lifecycle events are available Whether every record belongs to the displayed ad cohort
Appointment activity Which booking and attendance events meet the agreed definition Whether a later purchase was caused by a particular ad
Financial activity Which collections or transactions occurred Recognized revenue, profit, or lifetime value without additional definitions

This distinction keeps the review practical. The team can investigate spend and campaign delivery while identifying the gaps that prevent a supported downstream measure.

Build attribution from an explicit contract

A meaningful acquisition measure needs more than two totals. The source keys, event history, matching rules, time windows, and exclusions must agree.

For example, a customer acquisition cost calculation needs a defined spend population and an approved definition of an acquired customer. A return-on-ad-spend calculation needs a defined outcome value and an attribution basis. Changing either side changes the meaning of the result.

We scope this work with your team. The plan identifies available source references, mapping requirements, business decisions, and validation controls. The website example intentionally leaves those downstream measures unavailable instead of inventing an answer.

Keep campaign interest separate from financial service

A campaign name may describe what was advertised. A financial record describes what was purchased or paid for. They may be related, but they are not interchangeable.

The same caution applies to geography. The location named in a campaign is not necessarily the location where a lead booked or received service. Location-level marketing economics require a defensible allocation and matching approach.

ChartSplice’s reporting scope documents those differences. If a view uses campaign-name classification or a booked-location proxy, it should say so where that distinction affects the interpretation.

Show timing and publication context

Source platforms can revise delivery data. A recent business date is not proof that every required partition completed successfully, and a published reporting snapshot is not a declaration that the source can never change.

We define the reporting cadence, the validation basis, and how revised or incomplete information is handled. Different sources may have different periods and cutoffs. The interface should make that visible rather than imply one universal refresh time.

Turn the gaps into an implementation plan

Bring your ad accounts, CRM, scheduling or practice system, and the measures your growth team uses today. We will map the reporting questions to their required sources and identify which answers are already supportable.

The resulting scope can begin with delivery and extend into downstream reporting as the necessary data contracts are established. The work is tailored to the organization; this site does not promise a universal attribution model or a ready-made return-on-investment calculation for every source combination.

Your next operating review starts here

Let’s make your reporting useful.

A useful conversation starts with your business, your systems, and the decisions you want to make.

Book a demo